By: Mark C. Kriss, Esq.
NYSSPE Legislative Counsel

 Assembly Bill 10021A (Assemblyman Englebright) same as Senate Bill 7986A (Senator Stavisky)

This bill establishes a continuing education requirement for professional geologists in NYS. At the same time the bill modernizes the continuing education requirement for professional engineers and other design professionals. The bill has passed both houses of the NYS Legislature and is expected to be approved by Governor Cuomo.

Under current law professional engineers must demonstrate that they have completed 36 professional development hours during each triennium registration period. 18 of the 36 professional development hours secured during each such triennium  must be obtained via live lecture, in person classes, or live webinar. This legislation eliminates this requirement for PEs and other design professionals. In short, online courses of all types will qualify for all 36 development hours. Of course, live venues will also continue to be an option. All courses must continue to be specifically approved for New York State.

It is important to note that currently due to the pandemic the Education Department has on an emergency basis waived the live lecture, in person or live webinar requirement for licensees whose registrations renew before January 1, 2021 (see posting from NYS Education Department Office of Professions below.) The effective date of the legislation is January 1, 2022 so the status of renewals on or after January 1, 2021 must await further clarification from the Education Department.  It is likely that the broad use of on line courses will be extended due to the pandemic.

The legislation also permits a professional engineer to take courses in other design fields such as architecture or land surveying. Credits earned in related fields will count towards the triennium 36PDH requirement. (However, under no circumstances will the attendance at such courses be a ground for practicing in an allied design field without appropriate licensure.) The new law will permit up to 6 PDHs to be carried over to a new registration period from a prior period.  Present law does not permit such carry-overs.

Finally, NYSSPE has and will continue to advocate for broad recognition of courses across the country due to the significant number of our members who practice in more than one jurisdiction.  While continuing education is an important measure, we believe states should have uniform requirements to the greatest extent possible.

NYS Education Department Office of the Professions
 Some (laws and) regulations restrict licensees to a certain percentage of self-study for continuing education requirements. In response to the evolving situation with the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19), and for those licensees whose registrations are due to renew March 1, 2020 – January 1, 2021, the Department will grant an adjustment to all licensees to complete up to 100% of the continuing education as self-study, so long as it is taken from a Department-approved provider and is in an acceptable subject area for the specific profession. SED is working closely with other New York State agencies and the Governor’s Office to tackle issues relating to COVID-19. Please continue to monitor the Department’s website for updated guidance.

_______

Note: NYSSPE facilitates posting on this blog, but the views and accounts expressed herein are those of the author(s) and not the views or accounts of NYSSPE, its officers or directors whose views and accounts may or may not be similar or identical. NYSSPE, its officers and directors do not express any opinion regarding any product or service by virtue of reference to such product or service in this blog

By: Mark C. Kriss, Esq.
NYSSPE Legislative Counsel

The State of New York and the State of Vermont share the distinction of being the only states in the United States which require Professional Engineers (and Registered Architects) to be perpetually responsible for projects they design, potentially for decades after they retire. All other states have statutes of repose which would, when applicable, require dismissal of a design liability case due to the passage of time after completion of a project.

For example, a state with a 7-year statute of repose would require dismissal of a design liability case against an engineer if the plaintiff’s injury or death occurred more than 7 years after completion of a project. (A statute of repose should not be confused with a statute of limitations which is a distinct timeframe running from the date of plaintiff’s injury or death itself. New York does have a three-year statute of limitations, but again, the statute of limitation’s clock does not start to run until a party is injured or killed. Obviously, this could happen decades after a project is completed.)

The forty-eight states which have adopted a statute of repose recognize that after completion of a project the design professional has no control over (i) the use of the property, or (ii) the re-use of the property, or (iii) the maintenance of the property, and that after a building or other improvement has performed satisfactory for a given number of years an injured party must look to others in control of the property for recovery respecting his or her loss. (Further, it is an extremely rare case where a latent design defect is the primary cause for a failure and the universe of defense costs associated with these claims are staggering compared to the universe of recoveries from these types of claims.) [Read more…]

By: Mark C. Kriss, Esq.   
NYSSPE Legislative Counsel

In New York State the general contracting community has broadly used design build  as an alternative to the traditional design-bid-build methodology for the development of private sector projects. Many general contractors offer project owners “one-stop-shopping” for both large and small-scale projects, by “hiring“ design professionals, PE or RA, rather than a project owner hiring a design professional. (Using a traditional design-bid-build methodology there would be separate contracts between, (i) an owner and a general contractor and,  (ii) an owner and a design professional.) See Charlebois v. Weller Assocs, 72 N.Y.2d 587 (1988) and the cases decided in its wake.

Since Charlebois has been liberally interpreted, by the courts, to permit general contractors to offer design services, there has been virtually no enforcement of illegal practice laws against general contractors, by the NYS Attorney General, for the illegal practice of the design professions.  Additionally, over the last decade the use of design build has grown substantially in the public sector and its acceptance in the public sphere has spilled over to the private sector.  (The increased use of design build in the public sector has been the direct result of legislative changes.) General contractors feel confident that they are not going to face charges for illegal practice and they do not face professional misconduct charges since they are not licensed by the state. Further, NYS Education Department regulations concerning the practice of the design professions, and the impact of these regulations upon professional engineers and registered architects, is of little concern to contractors since they are not subject to these regulations.

Notwithstanding the view of the general contractor community, licensed professional engineers and registered architects have to exercise caution in entering into design build contracts.  Care is required since the New York State Education Department (SED), which licenses and disciplines design professionals, has a different interpretation of the law and regulations wherein a design professional cannot, without qualification, “work for the general contractor” on design build projects. The only exception to this would be design services relating solely to the means and methods of construction (i.e. Temporary Shoring Design, etc.) or in cases where the general contractor also owns the project.

According to SED private sector design build contracts are permitted utilizing a three-way contract (Owner, Contractor and PE or RA) which specifically sets forth the scope of design services and the amount of consideration to be paid to the design professional.  The general contractor cannot retain a portion of the fees allocated to design services.  All three signatures can be set forth in a single contract document. [Read more…]